Hot art, fierce leotards and diva beats meet community activism in Flawless: A Beyoncé Inspired Art Show and Fundraiser taking place April 18 at Studio East. Flawless is one of a series of celebrity-themed art shows aimed at promoting creative accessibility and inclusivity. Local and international artists from all walks of life submitted paintings, short stories, drag, mixed media, video, drawing, bedazzling, dancing and sculpture to the show. Submissions of any size, medium, or skill level were considered, as long as content related to pop goddess Beyoncé.

But Flawless is more than a celebration of Ms. Knowles’ beauty and abilities; two of it’s main aims are to raise funds for the Positive Women’s Network, Canada’s longest-running HIV organization for women, and to support artists. All proceeds from ticket sales will go directly to the PNV, and featured artists will keep 100% of their commissions.

Sad Mag sat down with Christina Chant, the bubbly mastermind behind Saturday’s bootylicious event, to chat art, nursing and, of course, Beyoncé.

Sad Mag: Why did you first start doing art shows?

Christina Chant: It’s been almost four years, which is crazy to me. In the summer of 2011, my best friend and I—it was our third time going to Burning Man—wanted to plan something fun for a theme camp. A friend had joked about putting on a “Steven Seagallery”: an art gallery dedicated to Steven Seagal. We asked him for permission to use the idea and he said, “You do it, go for it. Just make sure it’s great.”

So we put on a couple art parties on at our house with friends who were going to Burning Man, just to come together and make art. When I came home [from the festival], I had all this art left over. I have friends who are artists and I asked one of them whether she any idea of galleries that would be interested in hosting this. She said, “Yes,” and I said, “That’s hilarious,” and laughed for, like, half an hour. She helped me put on our first gallery, which was at the Toast Collective in October of 2011. We had a great turnout and also made some money. We used that for the next show, “Bill You Murray Me,” which was huge. [From there], it just started rolling.

Untitled by Carl Ostberg
Untitled by Carl Ostberg

SM: What was the initial reaction to the shows?

CC: The best part was that lots of people wanted to purchase paintings, and lots of people were just really nice about wanting to be a part of it. We had a lot of first-time submitters, who said, “It’s amazing that you put this on, because it’s less pretentious, and I can actually participate.” [It’s true:] as long as it’s not racist, sexist, misogynistic stuff, we’ll put it in the show. It could be stick people and we wouldn’t care.

SM: I know you also work in nursing. Has your profession helped or hindered your involvement in the art shows?

CC: Well, [as a nurse] you have to be really organized; you’re prioritizing for chaos. You acknowledge that your day is unpredictable and you try to do all the work you can do up front. That way, when chaos does come, you are prepared. I’ve worked as a charge nurse and an educator, and you do more planning work and coordinating with that. I think it’s just helped.

SM: How do you brainstorm the themes for the shows?

CC: Well, for this last one, I was going to the bathroom—I was going pee—and all of a sudden I had this idea for Beyoncé.

SM: Epiphany?

CC: It was, it really was—Epipha-pee!

In the past, though, I’ve just brainstormed with friends. Bill Murray just came up in conversation. And because we’d done a few shows around men, I decided I needed to do something about women. Plus, Beyoncé’s a total boss. It just made a lot of sense.

The key pieces are just ensuring that the person we choose [as a theme] has a bit of nostalgia about them that people can connect to. That they can be funny, but also people clearly have to like the actual subject. It’s that connection—we love pop culture, you can’t avoid it. Our goal of inclusivity is trying to get people from different parts of the community to come out. Again, pop culture is a piece to that. You’re getting people from the suburbs to come in and look at art (which is amazing), but also, they’re getting exposed to different forms of art: drag, performance monologue, music. It just brings out a different crew, which I appreciate.

SM: Your past events have often been free or by donation. Why did you decide to do it differently this time?

CC: Traditionally we haven’t had a door cost; we really wanted to ensure that everyone can attend if they want to. This is the first time we’ve had a door fee, which I chose in part so that we have an honorarium for the performance artists. We thought eight dollars at the lower end of the sliding scale would be affordable to most people, but we still have that caveat that if people can’t afford it, they can email us and we can put them on a list. I know that we could make more money off of it, if we wanted to. But not everything should have to have a price. It’s expensive to live [in Vancouver], for artists especially. If you make the intention to make [something] affordable, it can be.

Untitled by Leanna Litvinenko
Untitled by Leanna Litvinenko

SM: And the proceeds from this door fee will go directly to the Positive Women’s Network, right? Can you tell me a little about what they do and why you choose to support them?

CC: I’ve worked in HIV, primary care, and mental health and addictions for seven years, and I’ve been on the Positive Women’s Network board for almost two years. The PWN provides support all across BC, through the internet and through an educator who goes across the community to provide education about HIV. They also have retreats; they provide money for the women to fly down and give them money for their childcare. It’s one of the few places where women can go to be open about their HIV status without dealing with stigma. Especially in rural communities, it’s just not safe to disclose your HIV status, and even in an urban centre, stigma is one of the most persistent things that has followed over the trajectory of HIV. So even though people can live very healthy lives and are not a risk to the community, because of the way our justice system is organized, it’s still very much a crime to have HIV.

So, [PWN] is great. They have a drop-in, a food bank day, and they help with general support and advocacy in the community. They do amazing, amazing work.

Untitled by Carl Ostberg
Untitled by Carl Ostberg

SM: What’s been the biggest challenge you faced while organizing Flawless?

CC: At the beginning for this show we weren’t getting enough submissions, which was scary for me. It’s hard not to compare to past shows; in the past we’ve had a lot of submissions up front. At this point we’re very comfortable with how many submissions we have, but it has actually been the lowest amount ever. I think people are afraid to ruin Beyoncé’s face, and she’s hard for people to be satirical about her. There’s a great Saturday Night Live sketch about it called the “Bagency.” You can’t criticize Beyoncé or you’ll be locked up and put away. She can’t be touched—she’s worshipped.

SM: What kind of submissions have you received?

CC: We got some really, really awesome stuff. When we weren’t getting enough submissions, I was hashtagging the “Beyhive” and other Beyoncé-type things on Instagram and Twitter, so we were able to get international contacts. We have submissions from Spain, South Africa, London, LA, Halifax, Toronto, Israel. A lot of them are younger people, so instead of them having to pay a lot for shipping, we’re going to be projecting their submissions.

 

SM: Okay, one last question: What’s your favourite Beyoncé song?

CC: I love listening to “Grown Woman,” but it’s a very close one to “Crazy in Love.” It’s just so fun to listen to “Grown Woman” while you’re at home, chillin’, or even cleaning. I think it’s great. ‘Cause I’m just like, “Yeah, I am a grown woman…so empowered!”

 

Flawless takes place Saturday, April 18 from 7 pm – 2 am at Studio East.
Tickets are available online or at the door.

 

“It’s time for men to step up and play a bigger game,” says Dwayne Klassen from centre stage at the Imperial last weekend. “We must own our authentic masculine power and be Champions to women, heroes to children and brothers to each other.”

In all honesty, I had no idea what to expect from Vancouver’s BIL Conference, an alternative and more accessible spin-off of the increasingly popular TED events. Klassen’s presentation on “Man Champions and Woman Heroes,” was just one of more than 60 to grace the stage at Vancouver’s second ever BIL Conference, which took place March 21 – 22. In under two hours, I watched presentations by a scientist, an entrepreneur, a politician and even an ex-monk. The best part? As a by-donation event, attending BIL was completely affordable.

“Unlike TED, our event is open to the public, widely accessible and fully participant driven. When participants arrive at the venue, they help with the creation of the event from setting up chairs to organizing the day’s schedule and everything in between,” says Michael Cummings, co-founder of BIL. “Everyone at the event actively shapes its outcome. It’s about building community and taking ownership of the event as their own.” Founded in 2007, this “unconference” has been hosted across the globe, in countries as far as Afghanistan, India, England, France, and Tunisia.

The schedule for BIL was as flexible as the admission price; speakers could sign up to participate as late as the day itself. In theory, says Cummings, anyone “knowledgeable or incredibly passionate about a certain topic” could opt to speak. Not that this diminishes the quality of the line-up; Luke Nosek (Founder of Paypal), George Whitesides (CEO of Virgin Galactic) and Blake Mycoskie (TOMS Shoes) are just three former speakers to have participated in a BIL conference. Highlights from this year’s conference include Beauty Night Founder and Executive Director Caroline MacGillivray on building a community around a cause; Green Party candidate Lynne Quarmby on science and activism; and General Fusion Founder Michael Delage on fusion energy.

Before it became a Canadian music sensation, HUMANS was just two people: Peter Ricq and Robbie Slade. When they first met at an art show in 2009, Ricq was an electronic musician, Slade, part of a folk band called Family Room. But after bonding over a shared love of high singing voices, the unlikely pair started jamming together. Six years, two EPs, and one national tour later, they’re still jamming—as two halves of the dynamic indie-electronic duo HUMANS. Using synthesizers and instruments to combine indie-pop and electronic elements, HUMANS is known for their unique sound and uncanny ability to get people dancing. Ricq and Slade promise that their newest album, Noontide, will be something new altogether. To be released February 24th by Hybridity Music and followed with a North America tour, Noontide is “a synthesis of time and space,” an “innovative mix of heavy electronics and modern pop sensibilities.” SAD Mag sat down with Ricq and Slade for the scoop.

Peter Ricq & Robbie Slade
Peter Ricq & Robbie Slade

SM: Where are you from and how did you meet each other?

RS: [Pete’s] from Montreal, and I’m from Nelson, BC. We met at an art show in 2009. He had a really disturbing bunch of paintings—I wont get into the details of what they were—but I was really intrigued, so we started talking. I got Pete to do [merchandise] for my band, Family Room, because I liked his paintings so much. We started jamming at the first meeting and I was kind of blown away.

PR: I invited Robbie to come over—well actually I invited the whole band to come over, and Robbie’s the only one who came. We did a track and then he biked home, so I called the track “Bike Home.” That was our first song.

SM: And so you’ve been HUMANS ever since?

PR: Yeah, Robbie was going to go firefighting, [until] I told him, “Hey, I got us a good show at Glory Days. I’ll do a music video, and we’ll print CD’s and everything. Let’s actually try and do it. ”

SM: Tell me a little about your new album, Noontide. What was it like recording your first LP?

PR: Some of these songs on the LP are about four years old, and some of them were done fresh at the studio. So it was just like taking a bunch of scraps from over the years and [putting them together]… What was fun about it was actually having good gear.

RS: And that we had more know-how; we came at it with fresh minds.

PR: Yeah, it was fun to go to a studio and experiment with the better gear—gear that we’ve always thought of using but didn’t have the means to [buy]. It was fun; it was actually like what “real” bands do.

SM: What makes you not a real band?

RS: Well I think we are now. Now that we had that experience—now we’re a real band.

SM: Are you excited about your upcoming tour? What are you most looking forward to?

PR: It’s going to be fun. We haven’t been on the road in a while.

RS: We’re working such long days right now between working and jamming everyday to make our set really rad. Our set’s really different from our album, which I’m actually really happy about.

PR: You know the last time we played [a set], we played it for like two and a half years. But this is going to be a brand new set that we’ve never played before and that’s exciting.

SM: What does your new set sound like?

PR: I think it’s housier, the live set is definitely housier.

SM: And the new album? Will you be playing any of those tracks during your tour?

PR: We are, but we’ve just basically remixed every single song. When we were in the studio, we had all the gear that we wanted, but we obviously can’t tour with all that. So when we made the live set, it was like taking another look at all of those songs that we took from the studio to figure out how we [could] play them like they sound on the record, but using crappy old gear. It was like writing another album, to be honest.

SM: How were you able to do that? Learn to play your set like it sounds in the studio, but on “crappy-ass” gear?

PR: Some of it has been rewritten. We’ve changed a lot of the endings or added endings. And we got a pretty nice sampler, so for some of the elements we can’t recreate, we just sampled [them], straight from the stems.

RS: I think [the audience is] really going to like that. Because it won’t be exactly like the album, it will be like all these strands [going] in different directions, while always keeping in mind that we want to keep people moving.

SM: Yeah, people definitely dance hard at your shows. It’s pretty amazing.

PR: To be honest it’s something we had to work on. But now we’re getting better at the sound, at keeping people dancing. That’s basically the qualifier—whether people are dancing or not.

SM: Are you nervous for your tour at all? Do you guys get stage fright?

PR: No, but we do get nervous when our music equipment isn’t working—when our cheap-ass gear isn’t doing what it’s supposed to do.

SM: Does that happen often?

PR: Once we played in Calgary, and one of the samplers that had all of our songs wasn’t working. So we could only play this really old set. Another time, the mixer was broken and we had to plug everything into DI’s (Direct Boxes). They’re really unreliable!

SM: I hope you can fundraise some money for new equipment!

PR: Yeah, but we’re so used to it. It would take forever to [learn our set on new gear]. We’d need like another two months.

RS: We have three keyboards of the same keyboard in the shop and we had to buy a new one because it’s still not repaired! It’s been there for years.

PR: In the beginning I was telling Robbie, “Okay we need two of everything.” “Why?” “Because they always break.” And he said, “Why don’t we just buy something that doesn’t break.”

RS: We should have done that!

SM: Well at least if the whole band thing fails, you two could always start a music gear repair shop?

PR & RS: Noooooo!

SM: Okay, okay! Sorry, I take that back. Your tour will be awesome, I’m sure. Any last words before I let you go?

PR: Yeah, we love you guys!

HUMANS will be performing in Vancouver on March 28 at Celebrities Night Club.
Tour dates & tickets on their website.

This weekend at the Queen Elizabeth Theatre, Ballet BC welcomes Miami City Ballet for their Vancouver debut, Balanchine, a collection of three works by dance legend George Balanchine. Widely regarded as one of the most influential choreographers of the 20th Century, Balanchine is not only revered for his artistic skill, but also for the breadth of his oeuvre. This weekend’s triple bill was selected to highlight both of these features. Indeed, aside from their masterful choreography and expert execution, the three pieces chosen for Balanchine are about as different as you can get.

The first ballet, Ballo della Regina, was performed by a male principal and an all-female corps. The piece is challenging and fast paced—so challenging, in fact, that Miami City Ballet is one of the few dance companies in the world granted the right to perform it. A tale of a fisherman in search of the perfect pearl, Ballo della Regina is vibrant and dynamic, replete with high jumps and complex footwork. Despite the demanding nature of the piece, however, The Miami City ballerinas made it seem almost effortless. Quick and light-footed, they seemed to flutter across the stage.

Second on the program was Symphony in Three Movements, a plotless, large-ensemble work, first choreographed by Balanchine for the opening night of the New York City Ballet’s Stravinsky Festival in 1972. Over 40 years later, it is still impressive. Edgy and contemporary, this invigorating ballet pairs a flair for drama with a subtle sense of humour. The dancers’ high kicks, angular movements, and unexpected twists gave the piece a jazzy feel, reminiscent of West Side Story.

Concluding the evening was one of Balentine’s masterpieces, Serenade. Although meant to be plotless, it is almost impossible not to imagine a narrative in the sorrowful swells of Tchaikovsky’s Serenada in C Major for String Orchestra to which the ballet is set. Lit by a bluish glow, sixteen dancers formed a long, graceful curve across the stage, dancing in synch. The ballerinas’ slow, languid movements resembled waves upon a quiet sea, their intertwined bodies like the vertebrae of some giant beached whale. In the foreground, two female dancers vied daringly for the attention of a single male companion. The pair mirrored and inverted each other’s movements, each woman becoming the imperfect shadow of her counterpart, until the two were almost indistinguishable. Concluding with a startling finale, Serenade was an eerie, but beautiful, finish to an exceptional evening.balanchine2


Ballet BC Presents Miami City Ballet in BALANCHINE

Queen Elizabeth Theatre (649 Cambie)
February 19 – 21, 2015 • Performances at 8:00 pm
February 21, 2015 • Performance at 2:00pm

 Visit BalletBC for tickets and information.

apres moi & the list“We’re all boxed in inside our cubicles, glued to our technology,” says Diane Brown, director of Ruby Slippers Theatre, when I ask her what the inspiration was behind this week’s double bill. Après Moi and The List are two translated Quebecois plays running from January 28th to February 1st at Studio 16. In addition to their francophone origins, the plays share a common theme: human isolation.

“People are not getting the human connection they need as social beings,” Brown explains, “We don’t know how—or we don’t have the courage—to reach out and build those connections.” Apparently, she’s not the only one who feels this way. In a Vancouver Foundation survey conducted in 2012, one in four residents of Metro Vancouver reported feeling alone more often than they would like and one in three reported that they found it difficult to make new friends. This trend toward increasing isolation and disconnection may be linked to poorer health, decreased trust and hardened attitudes toward others in the community. The Foundation poetically calls this effect a “corrosion of caring.”

Theatre, Brown hopes, can be part of the solution to our “corroding” community. Unlike TV or online entertainment, attending a theatre performance is interactive, “a conversation.” Viewers don’t just plug into a screen, they experience the action in an engaging way. A play doesn’t just give viewers a way to pass the time; it “gives [them] something to talk about in the car ride home.”

My commute home from Studio 16 is testament that Brown has achieved her goal.

Both Après Moi and The List are thought provoking pieces. Written by Christian Begin and directed by Brown herself, Après Moi is a collection of repeated moments—the joining of five disconnected but parallel lives under one shabby motel roof off Route 117. Story lines overlap and interweave, resulting in a profoundly human examination of love, lust and letting go. Snippets of TV commercials and splashes of clever irony are integrated into the action, adding humour to an otherwise dark story.

The List, written by Jennifer Tremblay and directed by Jack Paterson, is a 50 minute solo piece starring France Perras. A stunning examination of obsession and guilt, love and family, friendship and sacrifice, The List is the story of an isolated and anxious woman who believes she has murdered her only friend. Evocative set design and dramatic lighting compliment a powerful performance by Perras, drawing the audience into her character’s desolate life in small town Quebec.

Poetically scripted and compellingly executed, Après Moi and The List will give you something to think—and hopefully talk—about.

Studio 16
1555 West 7th Avenue
Show @ 8PM
Tickets: $18.50(student/senior) / $23 (general admission)
Purchase tickets

Click for more information and show times.

"i still dream about you" by Roselina Hung
“i still dream about you” by Roselina Hung

For the month of February, all new subscribers to Sad Mag will be entered to win an exclusive print of “i still dream about you” by Roselina Hung. Each subscription counts for 2 entires! 

SUBSCRIBE NOW

 

Local artist Roselina Hung still dreams about her last cat Ari, and isn’t afraid to talk—or draw—about it. In her latest piece, i still dream about you, she incorporates these feline reveries into a poster-sized collage print, piecing together a series of hand-drawn portraits her own and others’ past cats. For ex-pet owners, Hung writes on her blog, the print might capture feelings of love, loss and obsession; but “for anyone who hasn’t owned a cat before,” she warns, “the image can propagate the idea of the ‘crazy cat lady’ ”. 

For the sake of all our self-proclaimed crazy cat readers out there, we couldn’t let this opportunity pass us by. Sad Mag sat down with Hung for the scoop on all things art, feminism, and of course…cats.

 

SM: So lets start with the basics. Where are you from? How did you get into all of this?

RH: I’m from Vancouver. I grew up here and did my undergrad at UBC in fine arts. After I finished there, I moved to London, England and I did my masters there at Saint Martins. I was there for about 3 years and then I moved back at the end of 2006.

 

SM: How did you originally get into art?

RH: I think I’ve kind of always been doing it. There was never really any doubt in my mind that this was what I was going to do. When I was growing up, I’d tell myself that I was going to do something else—you know, like a more “practical” job. But I always just kind of ended up going back to art. I just always knew.

 

SM: You’ve done some residences in some amazing places—Banff, Paris, Reykjavik—has any one place stuck with you in particular?

RH: Each one was so different. I got something different out of all of them. When I went to Paris, that was the first time I moved away from home…and the first time I moved somewhere where I didn’t speak the language. I had a studio there just off the Seine and across from the Louvre, so that was a very romantic idea of being an artist. [The residency] in Michigan was kind of like summer camp. Off in the woods, we were in cabins and there was a lagoon. We’d all come together for home-cooked meals. And the Reykjavik one was an even smaller group, and the environment there was so unlike anywhere else—almost no trees, everything’s low bush, shrubbery. Parts of it look like the moon!

 

SM: Can you tell me a little about the cat print?

RH: While I was [in Michigan] I found some fabric with all these animal heads on it. Something about it was so tacky and gross, but it also really attracted me. So I made some mock-ups with different fabrics I found—a cat one, dogs, horses.

 

SM: How did you find the cats you used?

RH: I wanted to find images with people’s pets that they didn’t have anymore—that had passed away or been given away, so I was asking people for pet photos. Not many people sent anything to me actually…I think dog people would send more. I even had people write me and say, “let me know when you do a dog one.”

 

SM: What about cats attracted you?

RH: I’ve always just liked cats, and I had a cat for a while. And my cat still comes up in my dreams—you know, every once in a while. Once you’ve had a pet and it passes away, you just always miss it.

RoselinaHung-pbkm-print
http://roselinahung.com/

 

SM: Is that the same idea behind your pretty boys kill me collection?

RH: There’s a bit of a parallel. But with the pretty boys, I guess it’s a different kind of desire and love…

 

SM: I hope so!

RH: (Laughing) A different kind. I’ve done a couple now with different [themes].

 

SM: Where do the titles come from?

RH: They’re from text messages and chats that I’ve had.

 

SM: Really? How do those pretty boys feel about it?

RH: I don’t know…I haven’t talked to any of them. In some ways, they’re so generic—anyone could say them with how people text and chat. I don’t even know that they’d know it was from them.

 

SM: It seems so much of our communication is like that these days—generic. And that we build so much of our identity through these almost anonymous texts and chats. Did you think about that while you were working on the pieces?

RH: I was interested in the way that we were communicating desire and love through these little snippets of text. There’s only so much that you can put into [them]. They aren’t even original; we’re just repeating things that we’ve seen or heard somewhere before. Kind of like lyrics from songs—clichéd and repeated.

 

SM: I also noticed that you opted for male instead of the traditional female muse for this collection. What was your intention with that?

RH: I was thinking about that a lot, actually. They had “pretty boys” in art history. A lot of times they’d be the angels or the gods—all quite young and angelic looking. But it was always men painting them. I just kind of wanted to see a woman do it.

 

SM: So, the women in your paintings, are they supposed to be you?

RH: Kind of…kind of not. They don’t look like me, but the stories are all ones that I identify with, events that have happened in my life. I put a bit of myself into it, but my identity is hidden behind those women.

 

SM: Is it hard to put so much of yourself into your work?

RH: Before, I was doing more self-portraits—I was putting way more of myself into the work. Now I can just put the work out there and stand back. It’s still personal, but not so personal that I’m…you know…taking everything personally.

 

SM: Alright, one last question for the cat aficionados out there: Do you have a favourite cat story?

RH: My cat was an indoor cat, because I used to live near the driving license place and I was afraid of letting him out. He was actually pretty big, almost 20 lbs. or so, and my bed was small. I couldn’t sleep sometimes, so every night I would close my bedroom door. For a small period of a couple months or so, I would hear my cat running around the house as soon as I went to bed. I guess he’d been chasing a necklace of mine that I had dropped on the floor, [because] in the morning, he left it at my door. A couple weeks later, he left this little artificial rose, and then the third time he left me a little teddy bear. You know how cats leave gifts for they’re owners? They’re usually dead animals. I had the best cat—he gave me romantic gifts!

 

 

Brace yourselves for all the bikes, Birkenstocks and brews you could ever wish for—The Cinematheque’s annual European Union Film Festival is back. From November 21 to December 4, 27 countries will each showcase a film of their choice. The selection crosses languages as well as genres, promising to please documentary-buffs, thriller fans and rom-com lovers alike.

To save you some time and a lot of Google-translating, SAD Mag did some research to come up with a fool-proof list of this year’s festival must-sees:


Two-Seater Rocket (Austria). A classic love story with an astronomical twist: Photographer Manuel has the hots for his gorgeous best friend Mia, but can’t muster enough courage to tell her. But hen Mia falls for a dashing Italian pilot instead, Manuel decides win her back as any love-struck person would—by stealing a rocket ship and making Mia’s childhood space dreams come true.

F*ck you, Gohte aka Suck me Shakespeer (Germany). Sex, crime and…spelling tests? Zeki returns from a 13 month prison sentence only to discover that a high school has been built on top of where his stolen stash lies buried. In order to recover his money, he accepts a job as a substitute teacher at the school, with some hilarious consequences. Zeki isn’t just under-qualified for the job…he doesn’t even know how to spell Germany’s most famous poet’s name!

The Guilded Cage (Portugal/France). Maria and José are a poor Portuguese immigrant couple working menial jobs in a snooty Parisian neighbourhood. When José inherits unexpected riches, he and his family plan to move back to Portugal as they have always dreamed. But it turns out that the rich bitches they work for have grown fond of their underpaid labourers, and decide to do everything in their power to keep them from moving home and finally achieving happiness.

Vis-A-Vis (Croatia). A young director struggles to make his first feature film and a name for himself. Unfortunately, the script is hopeless, the lead actor is in the midst of an emotional crisis and the budget is nonexistent. Funny, clever and thought-provoking, Vis-A-Vis features Woody Allen-like characters, a soundtrack by Andrew Bird and absolutely breathtaking Croatian scenery.

Flowers from the Mount of Olives (Estonia). Ever wondered what it feels like to be an 82-year-old Russian Orthodox nun living in a cloister in the middle of the Arab Quarter? This is your chance to find out. In this award-winning documentary, Sister Ksenya reveals all—talking ex-boyfriends, Nazis and drug addictions—when she decides to tell her life story one last time.


17th Annual European Union Film Festival
The Cinematheque (1131 Howe)
November 21st to December 4th
Tickets & festival information

 

Film aficionados will fall in love with Ron Mann’s newest documentary, Altman, playing November 7 to 10 at The Cinemateque. The film celebrates one of America’s most daring filmmakers, Robert Altman (MASH, Gosford Park), for everything he was—an artist, a visionary, a legend.

Mann pieces together a vibrant image of Hollywood in the 1940s from scavenged archival footage—clips of Altman’s first films, extra shots taken on set during their production, and snippets of home videos. The world Mann recreates is rough, colourful and nostalgic; the viewer is thrust into a sunny California fuelled by American idealism—a place where life is easy, and everything is possible.

In the midst of this naive optimism appears Altman, the documentary’s strange and enigmatic hero. In the war against the superficiality of a growing film industry, Altman is a warrior for cinematographic realism. He challenges the age-old film-making conventions, producing a kind of media never seen before, and redefining American cinema forever. As actor Keith Carradine describes in an interview about the notorious director, Altman’s work “show[s] Americans who [they] are.”

Though heroic, Mann’s portrait of the famous filmmaker is also surprisingly human. Altman is not just a story about film; it is also a story about compassion, love and integrity. Mann unveils the family and  friendships, failures and successes, wild parties and wise words that shaped the man into the artist he would one day become. Altman, we learn, made his films much like he lived life: with authenticity, conviction and ultimately, great pleasure.

 

 SCREENINGS 

Altman
Friday, November 7 – 6:30pm
Saturday, November 8 – 6:30pm
Sunday, November 9 – 2:00pm
Monday, November 10 – 8:40pm

McCabe and Mrs. Miller
Friday, November 7 – 8:35pm
Sunday, November 9 – 4:00pm
Tuesday, November 11 – 6:30pm

Nashville
Saturday, November 8 – 3:30pm
Sunday, November 9 – 6:30pm
Tuesday, November 11 – 3:30pm
Thursday, November 13 – 6:30pm

The Long Goodbye
Saturday, November 8 – 8:35pm
Monday, November 10 – 6:30pm
Tuesday, November 11 – 8:45pm

$11 Adult
$9 Senior / Student 

Restricted to 18+ unless otherwise noted
$3 annual membership required for those 18+

The Cinematheque
1131 Howe Street, Vancouver
24hr Film Infoline: 604.688.FILM

Is it all a dream?
Is it all a dream?

I left the cinema feeling like I’d just woken from a very beautiful dream after watching Stéphane Lafleur’s Tu Dors Nicole (You’re Sleeping Nicole) at this year’s Vancouver International Film Festival. Cute, quirky, and just a little absurd, the film has all the qualities of surreality—strange characters, unexplainable happenings, and an overriding sense that nothing is really as important as it seems.

22-year-old Nicole’s (Julianne Côté) vacationing parents have put her in charge of their suburban home for the summer, leaving her to spend those hot months mowing grass and working a dead-end job in the small Quebec town’s thrift-store. Along with her best friend, Véronique (Catherine St-Laurent), she spends the rest of the daylight hours biking around, impulse-buying with her new credit card, and drinking beers while her brother’s band records an offensively loud album in her parents’ living room. At night, Nicole discovers what her eclectic neighbours do while they think no one is looking. She hasn’t been sleeping well lately, and spends many insomniac hours ambling through the dark streets.

Night and day are almost indistinguishable in this grey scale world, thanks to Sara Mishara’s breath-taking cinematography. LaFleur employs very few background extras, enhancing the film’s dreamlike quality. The streets are almost as deserted during the day as they are at midnight, and so Nicole appears as a lone figure drifting through an unending series of empty frames. Time likewise is unending, and each day feels just as hot, stagnant and aimless as the last. Events don’t follow a classic cause-and-effect sequence; just as in a dream, they occur almost inexplicably.

The surreal treatment of time and space recreates a moment many of us experience growing up: the moment we realized that mini-golf isn’t as fun at 22 as it was when we were 7 and that buying ice cream with a Visa card doesn’t make it free. It recalls that painful moment when we learned that best friends don’t always tell us the truth, and that ex-boyfriends move on with their lives, even when we don’t. Finally, Tu Dors Nicole reminds us of that moment we noticed that summer holidays can be just as dull as school—that waking life can be just as strange as dreams.

In the stifling heat of yet another inconsequential day, the girls ask, “Is this going to be our summer?” In this seemingly simple question lie a million more, pushing the audience to reflect on their own lives. Do we, like Nicole, bump through our days buying ice cream after ice cream to fill the time? Are we, too, passing through life in a half-awake stupor? Watching one slow moment slip into the next, it’s hard not to ask: “Is this going to be my summer? Is this going to be my life?”

Junk! boasted a creative concept, but failed to deliver.
Junk! boasted a creative concept, but failed to deliver.

“One man’s junk is another man’s gold,” sing Andrew Cohen and Alex Nicoll, both vocalists in Paul Snider’s, Junk!, showing at the Vancouver Fringe Festival. Performed exclusively using instruments made of discarded objects, this 60 min musical tells the story of Melissa, a young girl who stumbles upon a junkyard and its ten oddball inhabitants. Together with the gang, Melissa begins a musical exploration of climate change and consumerist themes, all centred around the idea that “junk is in the eye of the beholder.”

Despite its creative approach, however, Junk! failed to provide the gold it promised…at least in this humble “beholder’s” opinion.

Of course, the instruments themselves were fascinating. Among the most notable were a saxophone made out of a rubber glove, a stand up bass built inside a wheelbarrow, and a Glockenspiel constructed using old PVC tubing. Both aesthetically and conceptually interesting, these dumpster creations grabbed my attention immediately. Although these instruments were functional, however, many could not be hooked up to amps, and so their musical contributions were barely audible. The resulting sound scape predominantly featured guitar, percussion and vocals, losing the truly unique sounds to the blare of these more familiar ones.

The score, an original composition by Snider himself, was equally disappointing. Both instrumentally and lyrically repetitive, the only thing about the music I liked was the old hubcaps and empty bottles it was played upon. Likewise, Snider’s messages about consumerist culture and global warming were generic, and failed to convince me to start cutting up my old shoes to make bongo drums.

To top it all off, Junk! had little or no plot to speak of. Instead, performers moved from one mediocre song to the next, seemingly without cause. The musical, much like the instruments themselves, appeared to be held together with little more than shoestrings and duct tape.

With multiple technical malfunctions and generally subpar acting, Junk! certainly lives up to its name. The medium, is, indeed, the message, and in this case, I’m afraid they’re both “junk”.