We've got it all right here, folks! Everything that's ever been written up, photographed, and discussed on the Sad Mag website. Enjoy browsing our archives!



Seattle's First Annual Queer Music & Arts Festival

The Sad Mag crew is thick into production of our next issue, MadMadWorld, and we’ve picked a great city to go over our copy in! We are going to Seattle baby! (We are. For realsies. Like today.) The Seattle Queer Music and Arts Festival, and Sad Mag is taking a road trip!

From Mo-Wave’s Website: “We live in an age where pride parades are ubiquitous and queer culture is portrayed across all media outlets.  Yet for some, televised and marketed gay culture is a vapid and self-deprecating representation of queerness.  In our efforts to matriculate into mainstream American culture, we queers sometimes forget what makes us powerful: our ability to challenge the status quo, to push cultural boundaries, to redefine and set global definitions of art and music.  Uninspired by mockeries of reinforced stereotypes, ‘Mo-Wave is an attempt to showcase queers as tastemakers and rule breakers in modern society.  Additionally, ‘Mo-Wave aims to highlight the particular flavor that Seattle and the Pacific Northwest offers the rest of American queer culture, both historically and today.  The inauguration is coming. April 7-14: Seattle, WA!”

From November 23rd 2012 to January 18th 2013, Satellite Gallery curated (e)merging Art/Music/Poetry: The Vancouver Artpunk Archive of Doreen Grey, an inventive, interdisciplinary exploration of Vancouver’s emerging punk scene in the late 1970s. Centered around environmentalist, artist and videographer Lenore “Doreen Grey” Herb, who died in 2010, the exhibit delved into a vast archive of Herb’s creative works and memorabilia. Satellite Gallery’s curator, Jaime Clay, recalls Lenore Herb from both a personal and curatorial perspective.   

 

Shazia: What was your first encounter with Lenore Herb’s work like?
Jaime Clay: My first encounter with Lenore was as she was filming one of the local music shows. I was in one of the bands and was introduced to her formally by our singer. It was from then on, as I played and attended those shows in the late 1970’s that I would see Lenore often recording. She would be there with all her gear, usually alone, trying to get some of the band’s music recorded on video.

As for seeing her work (product) for the first time, I would see it presented at a pop-up art gallery around the same time. Pop-up art galleries were a recurring event back then: they gave an outlet for both artists and musicians.

But seeing her work for the second time, 30 years later, was more of a revelation. I lost contact with her (and my lead singer) in the intervening years, so finding her again proved a little difficult. Once I did, then looking at her video footage, it was all pretty exciting – having the patina of 30 years.

How does her work compare and relate to her contemporaries? Who were her contemporaries?
There were really no contemporaries to her in this genre, and she pretty much worked by herself, a decision she made and kept to. Some contemporaries would be artists Paul Wong, John Anderson, Elizabeth Vander Zaag, who specialized in video at that time. Lenore made enemies easily. She marched to her own beat, so her ideas never met eye-to-eye with any of the other artists working in the same genre. Their paths met for sure, but no collaborations ever occurred, nor the sharing of ideas. Lenore wasn’t a conceptualist. She was more of a realist. Capture the moment.

What is your favourite piece by Lenore Herb? 
I have many favourite pieces from her collection. From the show at the Belkin Satellite, I could stare forever at the picture or Lenore with her video camera, taken circa 1979. She looked so engrossed in her art, unaware a film camera was near her, capturing her image. I love all her musical video work. It is very difficult to pick out one piece. Yes, they stand out well on their own, but if you take many of them together (the compilation music video was done by me) you get a sense of the awesome power of the media and how it explored and exploited unknown territory from that period.

What is the significance of her work in a cultural and historical context?
Lenore’s work is historical; an important lost document to a period in Vancouver’s (and the West Coast/BC) art movement. There was no connection to New York, London or even San Francisco or Toronto’s art scene here in Vancouver. Lenore, having grown up with the local poets in the early 1960’s, and then the counterculture to the late ’60’ and early 1970’s, felt there was a need to record these short, undocumented times. At first she used film cameras, but it soon became evident, with the punk movement, that she needed to capture more than just still images. It was a catharsis on her part, and luckily the new medium of videotape was available in Vancouver.

Lenore Herb also ran an art collective in “Metro Media”. This was in the mid 1980’s. The storefront was a revolving door of artists, musicians and poets. She was active with “Mail Art” and received (and sent) mail art worldwide. She was also active in the new medium of colour Xerox, and the reciprocation of this art worldwide.

Her video footage alone contains rare performances of many local (and international) musicians from a time when no one else dared to record it. In addition to her music videography, she has hours and hours of poetry, again both local and international (Allan Ginsberg, Ferlinghetti, etc) as well as many hours of political events, especially around the theme of sustainability – at a time when such a word barely existed.

How was her work interdisciplinary? How is this relevant to artists now, and has anyone been inspired by Lenore Herb’s work in the recent past?
Lenore straddled many genres. Video, color xerox art, poetry, film, mail art, music…the list is immense.

Up until now, she kept her work very private. Part of the problem was her video was on old formats that were difficult to transfer to newer formats. And this is true today. Her archive is in dire need of preserving, as the tapes are quickly deteriorating. So not too many people have seen her body of work, especially as completely as was shown at the recent Belkin Satellite gallery.

Positive Negative, an artist-run gallery on Chinatown’s Columbia block, packs the room (and often the sidewalk out front) every month with clever shows that highlight local and international art and design talent—tonight’s opening will be no exception.

Lost in the City is a collection of photographs that portray the experience of navigating life in Canadian cities. Curated by Ben Knight, creator of DontLook printshop, with the help of local photographer Lauren Zbarsky, the show features ten artists from Vancouver and Victoria who explore issues of identity, control, knowledge, and reality within the chaos of a metropolis.

For Knight, it’s all in the details. He screen-printed each piece by hand onto a custom panel of sealed mahogany wood; each will be available for only $60.

Lost in the City opens tonight, Thursday, March 21, with a party at 7:00 PM (all are welcome), and runs until April 6.

Lost in the City
Positive Negative (436 Columbia)
March 21st-April 6
Opening party March 21st, 7PM-11PM
RSVP here 

Human Library. Photo: Liesbeth Bernaerts

How do you identify? What makes you passionate about who you are?

How do express your identity? Asexual, Anarchist, Athiest?

Do you want to talk about it?

Put your book in our library and share your story!

As part of the 2013 PuSh International Performing Arts Festival in partnership with grunt gallery, Vancouver will be hosting a Human Library.

We are currently looking for people who self-identify as being parts of communities that are often met with prejudice, misunderstanding, stereotype or hatred.

The Human Library is an international phenomenon, having appeared in sixty-five countries over the past twelve years. Originating in Denmark, the project was introduced to fight hate in communities through an innovative method designed to promote dialogue, reduce prejudices and encourage understanding. The Library enables groups to break stereotypes by challenging the most common prejudices in a positive/humorous manner.

Our Human Library project allows audience members to “check out” a human book for 20 minutes for an informal one-on-one conversation. This gives the human books a platform to tell their story and converse with a single audience member at a time.

Where: Vancouver Public Library Central Branch
When: 12 pm-4 pm, January 18-20, January 25-27, February 1-3
Minimum requirement: One day/weekend

Additionally, the Human Library Curator (Dave Deveau) will be hosting two workshops leading up to the festival to help prepare the books for the experience and help them all shape their stories.

In total, being a Human Book represents a 20-hour time commitment. It is important to note that as part of the stipulations of the Human Library Organization this is a volunteer opportunity.

Interested?

  • Send us your Human Library title(s).
  • Share with us what kinds of stories, challenges, anecdotes and/or stereotypes you might interface with as your Human Library title.
  • Can you engage an audience member in a 20-minute conversation?
  • What makes you passionate about this project and about who you are and what title you may represent?

Applicants must be available for the 20-hour time commitment including workshops. Please send your materials to Human Library Curator Dave Deveau at davedeveau@gmail.com. Apply by December 1st, 2012 at 4:00PM.

From the creators of the Steven Seagallery, Bill You Murray me? and the Zig-a-Zigallery comes the pimpest mutha-effin art show to hit Vancouver: Drop it Like it’s Hot, an S-N-Double O-P Lion art show.

While you’re sipping your gin n’ juice, get down to the sensual seduction of our chronic-lovin’ Doggfather. Weave us some corn rows marinated with ganja and Dr. Dre. We want the Doggfather lining the walls of The Fall in his iconic plaid while bouncing in his ’64 Impala on canvas. No talent necessary, fo shizzle, just represent the iconic king of Doggystyle in whatever medium you preferizzle. Dress up and get down to DJ’s Jonathan Igharas (Bike Trike) and Wyndom Earle!

Opening November 9th 2012
7:00PM – 2:00AM
By Donation
RSVP on Facebook

Sponsored by CiTR and the Arts Report

The rise of fast fashion is unfortunate for many reasons: the proliferation of disposable clothing; the unethical sweatshop labour required to keep up with it; the additional motivations for teenagers to spend their weekends loitering in a mall trend-hunting; haul videos. But the issue in the spotlight this week has been the tendency of retailers to colonize culturally meaningful designs and traditions for the sake of selling crap to trend-hungry, culturally-naïve consumers.

Paul Frank, memorable for their cartoon monkey imagery, recently provoked an outrage when they hosted a party described thusly: “Paul Frank celebrated Fashion’s Night Out with a neon-Native American powwow theme. Glow-in-the-dark war-painted employees in feather headbands and bow and arrows invited guests to be photographed on a mini-runway holding prop tomahawks.”

The party encouraged partygoers to chug cocktails such as the “Neon Teepee” and “Dream Catcher” while simultaneously claiming that they “[celebrate] diversity and [are inspired] by many rich cultures.” As Jessica Metcalfe of the Native American fashion blog Beyond Buckskin put it in a letter to Paul Frank Industries, “It is ridiculous to see this level of racism still occurring in 2012.”

Paul Frank invite

Except it’s not ridiculous, unfortunately. It’s neither rare nor unbelievable. Paul Frank was just the most recent audacious example of companies thoughtlessly considering dressing up like a “Native” to be a breezy pop-culture reference, dumping of a continent’s worth of distinct indigenous cultures into a feckless blender and mixing the resulting puree with diet Red Bull & vodka.

Previous offenders include Urban Outfitters, who were sued earlier this year by the Navajo Nation for committing cavalier copyright infringement on their eponymous copyright to sell products like the “Navajo Panty” and “Navajo Flask.”

The practice is so common that Jezebel made a whole slideshow entitled “The Most WTF Navajo-Inspired Clothing and Accessories.” And let’s not forget the seasonal popularity of the Sexy Indian Girl, or the capitalization of Spirithoods© on the animalistic “savage Indian” stereotype.

Indignant party-goers and anonymous internet commenters everywhere argue that there’s nothing racist about smearing “war paint” on one’s face, posing with a plastic tomahawk, or mounting a supposedly Peruvian stuffed animal on one’s head before diving headlong into the void. The claims that such acts are “celebrating” Native culture are undermined by the fact that all of one’s insights into the homogeneous “Native culture” they’re celebrating are derived from corporate party props.

Even worse, this party draws on the worst of prevailing Indian stereotypes: that Native people are savage, mystical, drunken anachronisms, practically mythical creatures; certainly not real people with meaningful histories and contemporary cultures. It’s depressing to realise that the partygoers who thought it was fun to dress up “like an Indian” probably thought it was no different than dressing up like a unicorn or a Harry Potter character.

Paul Frank PowwowThe only unique twist on the Paul Frank story is the aftermath, in which the company president, Elie Dekel, reached out to to Jessica Metcalfe and Adrienne K, the bloggers behind Beyond Buckskin and Native Appropriations respectively, to discuss how the company could rectify their actions and develop corporate standards of practice to ensure that a similar event wouldn’t happen again.

Concrete commitments include Dekel and both bloggers speaking at a panel for the International Licensing Merchandisers Association (LIMA) conference about the use of Native imagery in fashion, and collaborating with a Native artist to create designs that would see profits donated to a Native cause.

This is the real jaw-dropping turn of events: not the careless racism, but the thoughtful apology. It not only sets a bar for other companies that want to continue using Native imagery, but it demonstrates that it’s at least hypothetically possible for collaboration to happen between mainstream designers and Native artists.

Too often mainstream culture falls on the “frozen Indian” stereotypes, assuming that only through appropriation, re-envisioning, and marketing by non-Native individuals can indigenous designs break out of their irrelevant, prehistoric moulds and become appealing or interesting to the masses. Paul Frank apologizing, reaching out, and welcoming collaboration changes the conversation to include Native voices and perspectives, rather than simply plagiarizing them for the sake of convenience.

This isn’t to say that disposable fashion is defensible as long as they have an indigenous designer on board. But seeing this response at the level of Paul Frank has the potential to set a precedent for fellow fashion leviathans who can and have simply steamrollered over complaints and carried on, relatively unmarred by scandal.

Paul Frank could have issued a culpability-shrugging statement (a la Urban Outfitters: “Like many other fashion brands, we interpret trends and will continue to do so for years to come”) and carried on, and the sad truth is most shoppers would be undeterred from scooping up their products. What matters even more than their apology and subsequent actions is the fact that they could have chosen not to take them at all, but did.

Originally posted at Art Threat.

The work of Tobias Wong, a self-declared “paraconceptualist” and category defying artist-slash-designer (or designer-slash-artist), is intimately and revealingly documented in the latest exhibit from the Museum of Vancouver.

The show follows his progression as a sly critic of consumerism and marketing and a playful innovator, beginning with his early work as an art student to his most renown and subversive work. In light of his sudden and tragic death two years ago, it’s even more impressive that the show is bright and celebratory where one might expect gloominess. The pieces on display are captioned by those who loved or worked with Wong, sharing their perspectives on his creativity, ideas and dreams; each one is a lovely tribute in miniature, a revealing glimpse into a clever, iconic mind.

Fall is here and the long grey days have set in until June. When you’re feeling uninspired and are dreaming of dropping your projects to stay in bed all day, swing by the MOV instead. There’s no way you won’t leave with a fresh source of inspiration and a few great ideas.

Object(ing): The Art/Design of Tobias Wong
Museum of Vancouver
1110 Chestnut St
10AM – 5PM Tuesday to Sunday
Thursday 10AM – 8PM

In collaboration with the Vancouver Aquarium School Programs and Qmunity’s Youth Project, Sad Mag hosted The Sea Legs pinhole photography workshop  on June 20, 2012, in an effort to con­nect queer youth with Van­cou­ver artists in a safe space. The ocean composes most of the earth’s surface and the majority of life on the planet. We often anthromorphize animals, talking about genders and reproduction calling a barnacle he or she, but we must remind ourselves that these animals are beautiful without visible gender. We can’t normalize the ocean based on human assumptions. These animals are diverse, successful and most of them have no visible difference between male and female or no gender at all. The theme of the work­shop was focused on the education/preservation of local sea life and of tra­di­tional pho­tog­ra­phy as a fine art form.

Using old boxes from the gift shop, juice bot­tle lids, pop cans, expired film, and used film can­is­ters, par­tic­i­pants con­structed pin­hole cam­eras to pho­to­graph sea crea­tures in the edu­ca­tional wet lab.  Aquar­ium vol­un­teers provided education on the  var­i­ous spec­i­mens native to the Van­cou­ver shore­line, while par­tic­i­pants had a chance to han­dle some of the sea crea­tures before photographing them. Sad Mag’s Edi­tor in Chief, Cre­ative Direc­tor, Designer, and Pho­tog­ra­phers worked with par­tic­i­pants at photo-sta­tions (which were pro­fes­sion­ally lit by the amaz­ing Jonathan Wong). Select images from the work­shop have been pub­lished in the VANIMAUX issue and many more will be dis­played at the issue launch exhi­bi­tion, Van­i­maux II,  opening on August 2, 2012 at 7:00pm at the Gam Gallery (110 E.Hastings St). The images range from pur­ple ten­ta­cles, to abstract inter­pre­ta­tions of her­mit crabs, urchins, and anemones. Intensely colored, soft and dreamy, these are experimental 35 mm film photographs by:

William Flett
Kiesha Janvier
Theodore Lake
Esther Lemieux
Calvin Ling
Vinson Ng
Jaedyn Starr

Check out a few of their amaz­ing images below:

 

 

 

“A dog,” reads the familiar saying, “ is man’s best friend.” We favour these animals for their unwavering loyalty, devotion, and the inherent desire to protect their ‘owner’ in all situations, often regardless of the impact on their own well being. In return (presumably), they demand little from us and despite our questionable treatment of them within certain industries, remain consistently faithful. While the relationship between humans and animals is a vast one, it is our longstanding relationship with the dog, specifically, that is addressed in Facing The Animal, curated by UBC CCST Masters’ candidate, Tarah Hogue. Showing at the Or Gallery from May 29 to June 29, the exhibit features the work of Julie Andreyev, Mary Anne Barkhouse, and Bill Burns, three artists who are dissimilar in their preferred mediums, but similar in their collective inclusion of a central subject: the dog.

Julie Andreyev is a Vancouver-based artist, who collaborates regularly with her dogs, Tom and Sugi. Boasting both their own website and Twitter account, Tom and Sugi have become indispensable allies in Andreyev’s on-going exploration of animal consciousness. Employing primarily installation and video pieces, Andreyev gives the viewer the opportunity to comprehend the personalities of both Tom and Sugi. Shit Dogs Say(2012), Dog Walking Dog (2012) and Dog Dreams (2012) are all featured pieces in the exhibit, offering us a chance to directly observe the unique traits of each animal.

Mary-Ann Barkhouse encourages discourse on environmental issues and indigenous culture through the regular use of animal imagery, one of her regular appearing creatures being the wolf (an early predecessor of what we refer to as the domestic dog.) Barkhouse works within a wide range of media, ranging from sculupture and photography to jewelry. Red Rover (2012), a new piece featured in Facing The Animal, is an installation comprised of foam play mats, and two “teams” of wooden toys. Wolves stand on one side of the playing field, and directly face their opponents- the poodles. An image of the proposed Enbridge Pipeline decorates the playmats and sits directly underneath the animals.

Bill Burns explores the relationship between dogs and industry in Dogs, Boats and Airplanes (2003-2010), a photographic series that the artist compiled throughout many international journeys. Throughout the series, we observe the dog in a number of global settings and major cities. Each is embedded in a different location within a wide range of social, cultural and economic contexts, thus making for a drastically different reading of the canine in every photograph.

The North American dog industry is a multi-faceted one, especially when we consider it in relation to its domestic partner-in-crime; the feline. Modern dog “culture” includes specific breeding strategizes to produce designer dogs, a selection of culinary options and meal plans for our furry friends, dog hotels, boutiques, and furniture conventions, and an objectification of the animal that forces us to reflect on whether or not we are, in fact, still treating the dog as mans’ best friend. Each artist in Hogue’s exhibition invites us to reconsider this relationship in different ways, by presenting the dog with three drastically different representations.

Interspecies collaboration, such as that practiced by Andreyev, may be rare in practice, but is effective and directly addresses our common practice of rigidly separating the relationship lines between human and animal. In not only using the image of the dog in her work, but incorporating them directly into the creation of it, Andreyev breaks down the somewhat-challenging notion of appropriating the animal image/body for use in contemporary art. The notion of the Other is challenged, and the species is genuinely regarded as companion, by Andreyev’s equalization and value of her contributors’ position.

Barkhouse’s Red Rover is immediately visually stimulating, given both its central position in the gallery, and the effective use of hot pink, soft pink and black base colours. On one side, we have a pack of wolves, directly opposing what one could deem their polar opposites- a small group of poodles. Though all of the animals are “leashed”, the wolves are assembled in a pack form, and the poodles align themselves in a perfect line formation. The stereotypes that the viewer immediately assigns to both reveal themselves almost immediately, especially given that these creatures are standing on opposed sides of the Enbridge Pipeline. Traditionally, the game of Red Rover requires a certain degree of risk and determination. Both sides engage in the game knowing the outcome is unknown. There is a strange irony in the prospect of a group of wolves opposing a group of poodles, in our assumption that the wolves would clearly be the victor. These stereotypes, and the specific use of such two opposing animals, call to mind conversations of nature, animal culture, and the human imposition into a natural habitat.

The dogs that we encounter in Dogs, Boats and Airplanes, as aforementioned, are varied. Some of them are visibly more healthy than others, and in some we are able to more easily identify breeds. The human form may be visible in one image, and not in another. Some of the dogs sport outfits, or accessories. In particular, Burns is effective in reinforcing the different classes of the canine, which are ultimately determined by their human-centric societies.

The viewer is asked to look at the dog in three different ways in Facing the Animal. Andreyev asks us to reconsider the line of relationships between human and animal. Barkhouse directly gives us a glimpse of our involvement (and possible destruction) of both the natural environment and pre-established interspecies relationships within in. Last but not least, Burns offers us an international portrait of the dog, the canine, and the extreme variances within the images.

“Dogs”, reads another familiar saying, “are our link to paradise. They don’t know evil or jealousy or discontent. To sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring–it was peace.” (Kundera). Perhaps this is why the mysterious individual first said that dog is man’s best friend. The canines in Facing The Animal give us the opportunity, at many times, to both reflect and re-connect upon this familiar paradise. For those of us who have not yet had the privilege of living with a dog, we can experience it for the first time. Ultimately, Hogue’s curatorial union of these three artists prompts this: it is skilled, strategic, and directly invites us to face the animal(s).

Written by Zoe Peled
Originally published in whitehot magazine (here).
Image: Mary-Ann Barkhouse, Red Rover, 2012. 

Posted in Art.

Clement has a portfolio case full of bits and pieces, old woodprint scraps, and ink and paint swatches as a kind of storehouse of materials. “I like the idea that bits of discarded pieces of paper can regain value and take on a new role. I love the thrill of finding exactly the right piece. It is through this layering process that my drawings come to life. The anatomically correct beetle escapes the mundane realm of ‘textbook drawing,’ and escapes the flat surface of the paper too. Through my flowing lines and vibrant colours, I hope to give my beetle, bird or tree, personality.”

Sarah Clement, interviewed by Carmen Mathes for Sad Mag #10

Get your issue at our release party, August 2nd, 2012!